43 pages • 1 hour read
Nicholas D. Kristof , Sheryl WuDunnA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
One of the book’s main themes is that people can donate very affordable amounts of money and still make a difference in someone’s life. We may see splashy headlines in the news media about huge amounts given to causes by philanthropists like Bill Gates, but donors don’t have to be millionaires or billionaires to be effective. The authors make a point of emphasizing this throughout the book. They cover a range of people and causes, but the message to the reader is that whatever amount one can give can have an impact.
One of the best examples of this comes in the last chapter. The authors discuss trachoma, a painful but treatable condition of the eyes. Antibiotics to cure one person over a three-year period cost only 75 cents. “Is there a better use for 75 cents?” the authors ask (306). Some people who have endured trachoma over time need more than antibiotics. A simple surgical procedure lasting 15 minutes can remedy the condition for just $40, well within the budget of many people looking to donate to a good cause. The authors tell the story of Yagare Traoré, an older Malian woman who had this procedure, and it was life-changing for her. Again the authors ask, “Is there a better use for $40?” (307).
Other examples given include curing clubfoot through a series of medical procedures for $250; allowing a child to participate for one year in Reach Out and Read, the literacy program offered through pediatricians’ offices, for $20; providing someone with a mosquito net (that can help prevent malaria) for just $5; and supplying chlorine dispensers to provide safe water for a family for only $1.98 per year. The authors examine what makes people give or not give, and among the latter is thinking that their donation is too small to make a difference. The above are just few examples that prove otherwise.
Throughout the book, the authors highlight the fact that preventing a problem is usually more effective, and almost always cheaper, than dealing with it after the fact. The science of brain development has shown that the period from a fetus’s development in the womb up through a baby’s first two years or so is crucial in the case of education, socialization, and personal well-being. Thus, for many issues, programs that address this time period are necessary.
For example, Chapter 5 discusses the so-called “30-million-word gap.” This is the greater number of words that a child of professional parents hears by age four, compared to a child of parents on welfare. Studies have shown that hearing words is essential for children’s literacy skills, IQ, and later school performance. The Reach Out and Read program was begun by pediatricians to address this gap. Kids are given books when they come in for doctor’s visits, and their parents are coached in the importance of reading to them. As noted above, the cost for this program per child is only $20 a year. Compare that to the millions spent by school systems trying to raise standardized test scores.
Another example is the Nurse-Family Partnership described in Chapter 4. In this program, trained nurses make home visits to pregnant women, counseling them on the dangers of using alcohol and drugs, as well as smoking cigarettes. The nurses also help expectant mothers find resources and provide an ear to listen to their concerns. After the baby’s birth, the nurses continue to visit and dispense advice and assistance. Evaluation of the program showed, among other things, reduced instances of parental abuse, fewer visits to the emergency room, fewer subsequent pregnancies for the mothers, and a reduced number of arrests for the children through age 15. This program costs $4,500 per mother per year, which seems to be a bargain compared to remedial programs for youth who end up in trouble. For example, the state of California spends $216,000 annually on each juvenile delinquent in custody (97).
When we think about altruism, the focus is on the recipient of aid. Part of the purpose of this book, however, is to show that giving is beneficial to the donor as well as the recipient. The authors look at why people behave altruistically as well as why they don’t. In an effort to explain the altruistic impulse in people—not to mention persuade readers to act—they tout the benefits of giving to and helping others. Such benefits are not the result of hearsay or mere intuition but of research.
Brain scans have been able to illustrate how giving affects the chemical make-up of the human brain. During an fMRI, pleasure centers in the brain light up to varying degrees when subjects perform simulated giving actions. It’s not clear whether the pleasure is derived from a pure desire to see improvements in the lives of others or from the added respect one gets from society for doing good. One theory has it that the latter leads to positive results for the giver, such as attracting better mates. Either way, the act of giving seems to rebound to the benefit of the giver. Other research has shown physical and mental benefits from volunteering. An evaluation of the Experience Corps program for volunteers over age 55, for example, indicated that participants had improved executive function (organizing and planning processes), which often begin to atrophy in the elderly. Since impaired executive function is seen in dementia patients, volunteering could stave off the onset of dementia.
The authors assert in the first chapter that researchers "are developing new evidence-based approaches, and more charities are starting to measure and track their results, so there is an emerging science of how best to make a difference” (11). This helps to address the concern people have that their donations and efforts to help others may not really have much impact. The good news, the authors say, is that today more than ever we are able to rigorously test how effective a program is and pinpoint where our dollars will have the most impact.
One example given in the book was the clamor around supplying cookstoves to rural areas of developing nations. On paper, they seemed to solve many problems, yet a study done by Esther Duflo, an economist at MIT, proved their ineffectiveness in the field. This points to the importance of marshalling facts and performing trials before putting programs into practice. On the other hand, Duflo and a colleague conducted a randomized controlled trial on a microfinance program, another approach that has been wildly popular in the developing world (and that has garnered a Nobel Prize for Muhammad Yunus, one of its proponents). Their findings showed that while the program was modestly successful, it did not have the impressive results that many ascribed to it. This disappointed some people, but not the researchers: they had proven that microfinancing was doing good, just as intended, and they knew that incremental benefits—not magic bullets—are actually the norm in development.
By these authors