118 pages • 3 hours read
Charles DickensA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Vocabulary
Essay Topics
Quiz
Tools
The story skips ahead five years to Tellson’s Bank in London, which the narrator describes as “very dark, very ugly, very incommodious” (55). Those who work there, however, consider this part of what makes Tellson’s respectable, and strongly object to anything new; in fact, the bank doesn’t even seem to hire anyone who isn’t already old. This, the narrator says, is “on par with the Country; which did very often disinherit its sons for suggesting improvements in laws and customs that had long been highly objectionable, but were only the more respectable” (55).
Meanwhile, Jerry Cruncher is waking up in his home in Whitefriars. When he sees his wife praying, he throws a muddy boot at her and, turning to his son, remarks, “Your mother’s a nice woman, young Jerry, going a praying agin your father’s prosperity” (58). Mrs. Cruncher pleads that she is praying “for” her husband, but Jerry continues to scold her, saying her prayers have prevented him from earning money the last few days. He instructs his son to watch her while he himself dresses and prevents his wife from saying grace when the family sits down to breakfast.
Jerry and Young Jerry walk to Tellson’s, where Jerry sits outside waiting for instructions. When his father is called in for an errand, Young Jerry takes his seat and wonders aloud why his father’s fingers are always “rusty” (61).
Inside Tellson’s, Jerry receives orders to go to the Old Bailey, seek out Mr. Lorry, and then wait for Lorry to give him a message. Jerry and the clerk discuss the case being tried, and Jerry, learning that the charge is treason, remarks that the punishment (quartering) is “barbarous” (62). The clerk, however, merely replies that “it is the law,” and that Jerry should “speak well” (62) of it.
Jerry walks to the Old Bailey, which is “a vile place, in which most kinds of debauchery and villainy were practised, and where dire diseases were bred, that came into court with the prisoners” (62). The jail also contains a pillory and a whipping-post, along with crowds of people who go there for entertainment.
After relaying his message, Jerry is allowed inside the court, where he chats with a fellow spectator eager to see the defendant sentenced to death. Jerry attracts the attention of Mr. Lorry, who is sitting with the defendant’s lawyers, one of whom is staring absent-mindedly at the ceiling. Both the judge and prisoner then enter; the latter is a handsome and “self-possessed” (65) young man named Charles Darnay, who has pleaded not guilty to charges of conspiring with the French government.
Darnay’s composure slips slightly as he glances towards two spectators—a young woman and her father who are later revealed to be Doctor and Lucie Manette. The crowd, which up until that point had been eager to see Darnay executed, becomes slightly more sympathetic when they see how distressed Lucie is. Meanwhile, Jerry learns from those around him that both she and her father are witnesses for the prosecution.
The Attorney-General gives an overblown opening statement in which he appeals to the jury’s patriotism. He claims that testimony from both a former friend (John Barsad) and a former servant (Roger Cly) of Darnay will prove that Darnay is a spy, and that he was discovered with incriminating papers in his possession. When Darnay’s lawyer cross-examines these witnesses, however, holes begin to appear in their stories and credibility: Barsad is a gambler who never knew Darnay well, and Cly was once accused of theft.
Next, the Attorney-General questions Mr. Lorry, who can’t say for certain whether Darnay was with him in the mail coach to Dover five years ago but confirms that he was on the boat he took back from France a few days later. The prosecutor then moves on to questioning Lucie Manette, who says Darnay helped her settle her father on board the ship and talked with her about the American Revolution, arguing that the “quarrel […] was a wrong and foolish one on England’s part” (75). Despite this, and despite the fact that she saw two men with papers talking to Darnay shortly before they set sail, Lucie’s obvious distress makes an impression on the courtroom. Finally, the Attorney-General questions Doctor Manette, who doesn’t remember the voyage from Calais but says Darnay visited them once afterwards in London.
Darnay’s lawyer (Stryver) begins to cross-examine a witness who claims to have seen Darnay at a secret rendezvous but is interrupted by the other defense lawyer (Carton) throwing a note at him. Stryver reads this and, asking whether the witness can be certain of Darnay’s identity, instructs Carton to stand up; Carton and Darnay look nearly identical, “allowing for [Carton’s] appearance being careless and slovenly, if not debauched” (77).
This undermines the prosecution’s case, and Stryver gives a lengthy speech arguing that Barsad and Cly were paid to plant papers on Darnay, who had to make frequent trips to France on family business. The defense’s witnesses are then questioned, and the jury begins to debate. While this is happening, Carton’s attention seems to wander away again, but he notices that Lucie is on the verge of fainting; he later inquires after her with Mr. Lorry and then passes word to Darnay that she is doing well. Darnay expects to be condemned, but Carton says he thinks the jury will acquit him. This turns out to be the case, and Lorry sends Jerry away with a message to that effect, though Jerry privately thinks he ought to send the words “recalled to life” again.
Dickens makes extensive use of doubles throughout A Tale of Two Cities: characters, images, and ideas often come in contrasting pairs that underscore the unique qualities of each. In many cases, however, these doubles are not actually as dissimilar to one another as they first appear, and this proves to be the case with the “two cities” the novel is concerned with: London and Paris. Although Dickens clearly depicts the political and social problems facing Paris (both before and after the Revolution) as worse than those facing London, the difference is more of degree than of kind. In this section, for instance, the narrator talks extensively and critically about the complacency of the English elite and their total disinterest in making any changes to the status quo. Tellson’s, in its stodginess, is a symbol of this “precept, that ‘Whatever is, is right” (63), which later proves to be the prevailing wisdom in France as well: the French aristocracy simply refuse to see that their exploitation of the lower classes is unsustainable. The cruelty and injustice of the two country’s legal system is another point of similarity between England and France; in fact, Darnay’s trial at the Old Bailey in many ways mirrors his later trial in Paris.
One of the most obvious parallels between the two trials is the role that Carton plays in saving Darnay each time. In fact, Carton and Darnay themselves are foils to one another, and are introduced to readers in the same chapter. At least initially, the striking physical resemblance between the two men (which Carton exploits to secure Darnay’s acquittal) only emphasizes how different they are in character: where Darnay is neatly dressed, Carton is “slovenly” (77); where Darnay is courteous and attentive throughout the trial, Carton seems bored by the proceedings. Darnay, in other words, appears to be a conventional literary hero—handsome, noble, and polite—while Carton seems at best pitiful and at worst immoral. Even at this early stage, however, Dickens hints that there are hidden depths to Carton, who is apparently paying more attention to his surroundings than he lets on: he not only comes up with the line of questioning that saves Darnay’s life, but is also the first person to notice that Lucie seems unwell (although he is once again “careless” and “almost insolent” (81) when he discusses the topic with Darnay).
By Charles Dickens