72 pages • 2 hours read
AnonymousA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The epistle to the Hebrews is unique among New Testament texts in that it does not have a firm authorship attribution. Some eras of Christian history have sought to assign it with Paul’s letters, but its internal style and theological grammar do not seem to fit the Pauline model. Other possibilities have been proposed, including Barnabas or Apollos, but these are largely speculations. The only significant clue is in the closing lines, where mention is made of Timothy, which suggests that the author may have been a member of the wider Pauline circle. This much can be said, however: based on its reception and circulation among early Christian communities, we know that it was regarded as hailing from the apostolic generation and that it bore the authority of that first group of Christian leaders. While the title of the epistle, Hebrews, suggests that it may have been written to a group of Jewish-background Christians, it is worth remembering that the titles for the books of the New Testament were added later. The epistle does not mention an addressee, and its opening more closely resembles a treatise than a letter. Nevertheless, it does assume a broad familiarity among its audience with the details of Old Testament interpretation, so it was likely written either to Jewish Christians or to Gentile “God-fearers” who had frequented synagogues.
Hebrews appears to address a situation in which some Christians were facing persecution and were contemplating a return to the observance of Jewish temple rituals. Such a move might indeed have deflected persecution, both from potential hostility arising from local Jewish leaders as well as the Romans since Jews had an exemption from Roman religious laws. Returning to a more Jewish form of worship, then, might permit the Christians to avoid detection by Roman authorities. The author of Hebrews pushes back against this temptation, presenting the gospel of Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of the previous covenant in such a way that it precludes going back to earlier forms.
The epistle deals with the status and identity of Christ, who is “[…] the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature” (Heb 1:3). It presents Jesus as representing the ultimate communication of God’s message to humanity, in a way that supersedes both the prophets and the angels. It then goes on to portray the gospel of Jesus as an entrance to the Sabbath as it was meant to be understood, as God’s offer of true rest. Hebrews presents a long exposition (Heb 7-11) of the many ways in which Jesus completes the sacrificial rites of ancient Israelite religions, serving both as the high priest and as the sacrifice that was offered. Drawing on Israelite traditions from the Day of Atonement, Hebrews shows Jesus as having performed a once-for-all ritual to take away the sins of the people by presenting the blood of his own sacrifice in the heavenly tabernacle: “For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified” (Heb 10:14). The final chapters then go on to offer encouragement to Christians in their persecutions, reminding them of the courage of the great historical exemplars of faith and exhorting them to continue steadfast in their allegiance to Christ.
The epistle of James is written by a Christian leader of that name, who, according to tradition, is James the Just, a member of Jesus’s family (that is, his adelphos, variously identified by Christian denominations as a half-brother, step-brother, or cousin of Jesus). After Peter began traveling elsewhere, James had become the leader of the Jerusalem church, a post he retained until his martyrdom in the 60s CE. He was known for his forthright and practical form of Christianity, expressed in ascetic devotion, which earned him the appellation “the Just” (or “Righteous”). The epistle of James matches the traditional picture of its author because it is focused on the question of how Christian faith is expressed in practice. It addresses itself to “the twelve tribes in the Dispersion” (James 1:1), which is likely a reference to all Christians, using the language of the Old Testament to designate them as God’s covenantal family.
James begins by encouraging Christians to rejoice in their sufferings, trusting in God to give graciously what they need at the appropriate time. In accordance with the letter’s focus on practical faith, it urges them not only to listen to the teaching of the gospel but also to put it into action through their deeds, by serving the poor and caring for the outcasts. James also includes a section that at first glance appears to be a rebuttal of Paul’s doctrine of salvation by faith rather than by works, even to the point of engaging with the example of Abraham, as Paul himself did in Galatians: “You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone” (Jas 2:24). On closer inspection, however, it seems more likely that James is not pushing back directly against Paul, largely because Paul did not discount the necessary place of works in the expression of one’s Christian faith (Eph 2:10). James appears to be reining in a teaching that has apparently parroted Paul’s talking-points but has gone even further by promoting a purely spiritual faith that has nothing to do with living righteously. The remainder of the Book of James details those behaviors that exemplify Christian faith, such as controlling one’s speech, seeking wisdom and humility, avoiding the temptation of wealth, and exercising patience in difficult times.
First Peter is a letter from the disciple Peter that is addressed to Christian communities scattered across a wide area of Asia Minor (which suggests that Peter had likely undertaken missionary journeys in that area after his activities related in the Book of Acts). On the spectrum between Paul’s predilection for abstract theology and James’s for practicality, Peter falls somewhere in the middle. Peter’s main point is to remind his audience that their Christian faith has given them a new, all-encompassing identity, and that the way they live should demonstrate the truth of that identity. He calls his readers to pursue holiness and unity and avoid the sins that tear people apart from one another. He grounds this exhortation in a metaphor of Christian identity drawn from the Old Testament: he identifies Christians as “[…] living stones [that] are being built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ” (1 Pet 2:5).
Peter advises Christians to live as good citizens and neighbors, to submit to local authorities, and to exemplify an honorable way of life. Even so, he warns them, they will likely still face persecution, and they ought to be prepared: “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings […]” (1 Pet 4:12-13). Peter brings all his advice down to one principle, also reflected in Jesus’s teaching and the writings of Paul and John: the all-encompassing call to love: “Above all, keep loving one another earnestly, since love covers a multitude of sins” (1 Pet 4:8).
The epistle of 2 Peter is attributed to the disciple Peter and was either written late in his ministry or was compiled by another person from Peter’s wider circle after his death (2 Pet 1:13-15). If it is the work of Peter or his circle, it would date to the second half of the first century, but some critical scholars suspect that it is a pseudonymous work that could be as late as the second century. Second Peter harmonizes with the themes of 1 Peter, but it also includes topics that draw from the apocryphal writings (texts that are considered instructive but not part of the Hebrew Bible) of Second Temple Judaism, such as the Enochic literature. It appears to borrow some of its content from the epistle of Jude.
Second Peter, like its predecessor, encourages Christians to understand their identity in Christ and to live in accordance with that identity: “Therefore, brothers, be all the more diligent to confirm your calling and election, for if you practice these qualities you will never fall” (2 Pet 1:10). Peter advises his readers to be on the lookout for false teachers, reminding them of the dangers that have befallen previous generations who went astray, like the rebellious angels, the society of Noah’s time, and the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. Peter also addresses some concerns about why Jesus has not already returned; at least some Christians had been hoping for an imminent and immediate return (“They will say, ‘Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation’” [2 Pet 3:4]). In response, Peter advises them to be patient and to adopt a much broader perspective on the passage of time: “[…] with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (2 Pet 3:8). Peter believes that God is holding off the end of history in a desire to extend the promise of salvation to more people and to give them even more time to come to repentance.
The term “general epistles” refers to those New Testament epistles that are addressed to a general audience rather than to a specific church or person (though there are exceptions; see 2 and 3 John below). Hebrews is not always included in lists of the general epistles, largely because certain periods of church history have tended to ascribe it to Paul’s authorship. For the purposes of this study guide, however, it is treated as one of the general epistles since it matches the criteria for that group. The general epistles are also sometimes called the “catholic epistles” because many are addressed to the whole Christian community (“catholic” with a lowercase “c” means “universal”).
Hebrews and James are notable in the New Testament canon because they appear to reflect a context situated within Jewish Christianity, whereas much of the rest of the New Testament (particularly the letters of Paul) is engaged with the emerging forms of Gentile Christianity. Clear divisions between Jewish and Gentile Christianity tend to be more elusive than scholars previously believed, but Hebrews and James nevertheless offer us significant insight into the mindset of believers who came from backgrounds saturated in Jewish thought. In the case of Hebrews, this focus on Jewish Christianity is reflected by a detailed interaction with ceremonial practices from the Old Testament temple traditions. In James, it comes out in a practical sensibility toward Christian theology, with a primary emphasis on the actions that exemplify true faith. The epistles of Peter also reflect a measure of this practical sensibility while also showing some of the ways that early Christian thought carried forward threads from Jewish tradition, using both canonical and noncanonical sources.
Because of this Jewish Christian background, the theme of The Relationship Between the Old and New Covenants is of primary importance. Each of the writers of these epistles draws heavily on traditions from the Old Testament, from the temple laws in Hebrews to Peter’s use of “royal priesthood” terminology to describe Christians (1 Pet 2:9; compare with Exod 19:6). The writers view their Christian faith as the direct fulfillment and continuation of earlier traditions, not as a new religion now branching off. This belief can be seen in the opening lines of James’s epistle, in which he addresses his Christian audience in terms that refer directly to the covenant community of the Old Testament: “the twelve tribes” (Jas 1:1). In the case of Hebrews, the old covenant is fulfilled by the new covenant in such a way that the old ceremonial laws are no longer required because Jesus has already accomplished the purpose for which they existed.
The symbol of the temple appears in these epistles (See: Symbols and Motifs), most prominently in 1 Peter 2:5: “You yourselves like living stones are being built up as a spiritual house […] to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.” Here, as in the letters of Paul, the symbol of the temple is being used to illustrate the nature of the Christian Church. Hebrews also uses temple symbology, but not in the same way as Peter or Paul. For the author of Hebrews, the temple (in the form of its predecessor, the tabernacle) functions not as a symbol of the church but as a literary foreshadowing, pointing toward the ultimate fulfillment of the rites of atonement in the death of Jesus Christ.
By Anonymous