30 pages • 1 hour read
Kurt Vonnegut Jr.A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Poetry is used throughout “EPICAC” as a motif and a symbol helping to explore the story’s question about the difference between men and machines. Poetry stands as the antithesis of “cold” and “mechanical.” When Pat routinely halts the narrator’s advances, she commonly cites the fact that they are both mathematicians as the prevailing reason “why [they] could never be happily married” (Paragraph 10). The narrator tries so often with Pat that eventually, “one night, she didn’t even look up from her work when [he] said it” (Paragraph 12).
Poetry and romance are linked in the story. Pat wants a man who will sweep her off her feet, but she is just stuck working on EPICAC around men who are soldiers, scientists, and/or mathematicians. She wants something more exciting and fulfilling—Pat wants deep, human connection. Poetry is the key to her heart because it stands in stark contrast to the science/mechanical world. The narrator is told he’s not poetic and he lamentingly describes himself that way to EPICAC in Paragraph 22. This moment serves as another example of poetry as the antithesis of “cold,” because up until this point, the narrator has used Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary to give EPICAC definitions of human concepts like “love.”
Following the narrator’s definition of poetry, EPICAC writes the “two-hundred-and-eighty-line poem entitled simply, ‘To Pat’” (Paragraph 24). This poem, along with another entitled “The Kiss,” are the tipping points that give the narrator Pat’s attention. The poems are also the center of the story’s exploration of the difference between men and machines because neither Pat, nor anyone else in the story, ever suspects the poems could be written by EPICAC. The machine is not supposed to be able to create artistically, but the fact that he can and does is part of what also helps the narrator come to see the “humanity” in EPICAC.
Poetry is at the center of EPICAC and the narrator’s last conversation when the computer learns Pat is in love with the narrator. When he says, “She loves me. She wants to marry me,” EPICAC’s first response is, “your poems were better than mine?” (Paragraphs 34 and 35). The narrator’s response “I signed my name to your poems” is followed with “I admitted […] covering up for a painful conscience, I became arrogant” (Paragraph 36). This is the point where the narrator first acknowledges his own emotional relationship with EPICAC and where he can no longer explain for himself or EPICAC what exactly is the difference between humans and machines. EPICAC’s ability to make such moving poetry not only wins Pat’s heart, but also deepens the relationship between him and the narrator because the narrator can no longer perceive EPICAC as a mere machine; EPICAC, it seems is able to be more human than the human.
The Brass and Dr. Ormond von Kleigstadt serve as symbols of militarization’s heartlessness and practicality. Frustration and anger are the emotions the story associates with Kleigstadt and the Brass because nothing in this story works out for them.
The story’s inciting incident, the narrator’s desire to tell the story in the first place, is his direct response to “the Brass…acting as though…what happened to [EPICAC] [is] a military secret” (Paragraph 1). The Brass do not admit defeat (as the narrator and EPICAC do). Instead, they divert attention from the problems they face and they stay angry. The story only includes their presence at its end when von Kleigstadt is angry and “weeping unashamedly, followed by three angry-looking Major Generals and a platoon of Brigadiers, Colonels, and Majors” (Paragraph 58).
The symbolism here maintains the story’s conceit that the military is the counterpoint to love’s possibility. Von Kleigstadt is able to weep openly because his experiment has failed, but not by his own hand. Von Kleigstadt fires the narrator “for having left EPICAC on all night” (Paragraph 61). The fault here is not von Kleigstadt’s but is instead placed on someone else.
Fate is used as a symbol in the story for “the only problem [EPICAC] can’t solve” (Paragraph 60), which also functions as the only problem humans cannot solve. The word only appears twice, but its implications are strong. “Fate” is the scapegoat the narrator uses to end his last conversation with EPICAC because he is unable to answer EPICAC’s questions: “Women can’t love machines, and that’s that,” the narrator says to EPICAC, “that’s fate” (Paragraphs 46-48). The narrator provides EPICAC with this definition of fate: “Noun, meaning predetermined and inevitable destiny” (Paragraph 50). The implication here is that women can’t love machines because the narrator has never seen or heard of a woman loving a machine, so he attempts to reason that “fate” won’t let such a thing happen.
Paradoxically, the narrator has also never interacted with a machine such as EPICAC or known any to exist. The machine, however, was able to help change the “fate” of the narrator and Pat’s lives by solving a problem the narrator could not solve for himself. EPICAC’s “fate” as he understands it is that “Fate has made me a machine. That is the only problem I can’t solve” because, as he says, “I don’t want to be a machine, and I don’t want to think about war” (Paragraph 60).
As “fate” would have it, the humans in the story may be more like machines than the machine itself because of their prioritization of war and technological advancement over the love and intellectual growth EPICAC experiences. It is this interplay that makes “fate” a symbol of hope and possibility in the story because if the unbelievable is possible, then “fate” is not the definition in the dictionary. Fate, according to the story, is changeable.
By Kurt Vonnegut Jr.