logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Edwin A. Abbott

Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions

Fiction | Novella | Adult | Published in 1884

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Sections 7-12Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1, Section 7 Summary: “Concerning Irregular Figures”

Content Warning: The analysis of this portion of the novel contains references to sexual assault.

In this section, the Square elaborates on the social position of Irregular shapes in Flatland. He gives as an example of an Irregular shape, a tradesman who “drags behind his regular and respectable vertex, a parallelogram of twelve or thirteen inches in diagonal” (12). In Flatland, these kinds of deformities are equated with immorality and criminal behavior, and the Square declares that tolerating Irregular figures actually puts the entire country in danger. Irregular figures are, throughout their lives, mocked, neglected, and excluded from respectable social positions and activities. The Square adds that it is necessary for the government to measure and document the shapes of all Flatland’s inhabitants to ensure that civilization does not descend into chaos and violence. He emphasizes that Irregular figures violate Nature’s laws as well as those of the state.

However, he speaks out against the choice by certain Flatland districts to kill any infant born with as much as half a degree of deviation. Some of Flatland’s “ablest and best men, men of real genius” suffer from irregularities, and society would have suffered without their contributions (25). He adds that certain therapies have been developed that can partly or wholly cure these deformities; however, he undermines his seemingly progressive position by arguing that once a shape is developed to the point at which no cures will be effective, the Irregular infant should be mercifully killed.

Part 1, Section 8 Summary: “Of the Ancient Practice of Painting”

The Square admits that while Flatland’s history is full of exciting battles, rebellions, factional splits, and conspiracies, it is a very dull place in terms of aesthetics. Everything there, including art, is composed of only straight lines with “no varieties except degrees of brightness and obscurity” (26). He then describes the “Colour Revolt,” an uprising led by a Pentagon known as Chromatistes who discovered simple colors and painted his own house. The trend of painting spread through Flatland quickly and soon everyone but the most conservative Pentagons were painting their dwellings, and within two generations, all beings in Flatland were colorful except for the women and the priests. While he suggests that many people saw the Revolt as sinful and immoral, the Square himself sees it as a positive event that added joy to the everyday lives of Flatlanders. The Revolt reached its climax during a military review, when an illustrious Circle became so overwhelmed by the beautiful sight that he declared he would leave his government post and become an artist. The language of Flatland even became richer during this period, with writers producing the land’s finest poetry.

Part 1, Section 9 Summary: “Of the Universal Colour Bill”

The downside of the Revolt, the Square goes on to say, was that the “intellectual Arts” were no longer necessary (28). The practices of recognition by sight and feeling fell into disuse, leading to the decay of educational institutions, and the lower classes began to understand that there were no significant differences between them and the polygonal classes, which led them to demand that the latter stop monopolizing certain behaviors and privileges. Ultimately, the lower classes demanded that all aristocratic distinctions be eliminated and all shapes in Flatland be given equal rights. In addition, all Flatlanders, including women and priests, were to be painted as an homage to color. In a further insult to the old order, the women and priests were to be painted with red and green, making it difficult to distinguish between the two groups.

The Square describes the shape who introduced this demand as an “Irregular Circle” who should have been killed in childhood (29). The law requiring women to be painted like priests was intended to make women feel as special and respectable as the priestly class, and consequently Flatland’s women were highly supportive of the “Universal Colour Bill.” Beyond this specific mandate, the bill was intended to generally demoralize the upper-class Circles. This purpose would be accomplished mainly by degrading the art of sight recognition, the principal method aristocrats used to distinguish between members of their own class and their supposed inferiors.

Part 1, Section 10 Summary: “Of the Suppression of the Chromatic Sedition”

The arguments about the Universal Colour Bill lasted for three years, during which time a huge force of Isosceles Triangles defeated an army of Polygons. There was a great deal of domestic unhappiness as wives tried to convince their husbands to support the bill, sometimes even killing their husbands and children in the process. However, the disaster came to an unexpected end when an Isosceles painted himself like a Polygon, feigned the Polygon’s voice, and raped the orphan daughter of a noble; upon learning of the fraud, the woman killed herself. When news of this spread, women throughout Flatland turned against the bill, believing that the male shapes would take advantage of it to hurt them in similar ways. The Circular class convened “an extraordinary Assembly of the States,” during which the Chief Circle, Pantocyclus, manipulated the lower classes into turning against the bill (32). He did this not only by pointing out potential dangers for women, but by reminding the Regular Isosceles Triangles that many of them might yet advance into higher ranks of society but would not be able to do so if all social distinctions were erased by the law.

A short but violent battled ensued, during which a group of Irregular Isosceles slaughtered the remaining Chromatistes. By the end of the incident, the Irregulars had killed each other with their sharp angles, and the rebellion was finished. After taking back their power, the Circles decimated the working classes, killed any Triangle suspected of irregularity, and put the whole of Flatland under surveillance. The use of color was prohibited, and as of the Square’s narration, only the Chief Circle has access to it.

Part 1, Section 11 Summary: “Concerning Our Priests”

Before arriving at the central event of the story—a description of his introduction to “the mysteries of Space”—the Square feels he must provide more information about the priestly class of Circles. He explains that the priests do not actually do any work themselves but are responsible for administering work done by all other classes, including educators, statesmen, engineers, and architects. They are not circles in a literal sense but polygons whose sides are so small and so numerous that their perimeters feel and look like circles. While Circles can rise unrestricted through society, they are subject to some natural laws: as they develop, their development increases in speed, and over time, they become less fertile. Additionally, doctors have discovered that the “small and tender sides” of polygonal infants can be easily fractured and reset in such a way that their development is sped up even further, although this procedure is extremely dangerous (36). The mortality rate is so high that noble polygons often place their children in a special hospital by the time they are a month old; if they survive, their parents feel a special sense of triumph.

Part 1, Section 12 Summary: “Of the Doctrine of Our Priests”

The Square begins this section by emphasizing the importance of “configuration” for Flatlanders, particularly for priests (37). He admits that most Circles do not see qualities like effort, training, or encouragement as having any real impact on behavior: according to them, everything depends on a shape’s configuration. He again references Pantocyclus, the illustrious Circle who stopped the Colour Revolt. Pantocyclus argued that all defects, no matter how minor, stemmed from a deviation in the physical form. The Square himself has a difficult time either accepting or rejecting this doctrine, and he describes how it often fails to account for shapes’ behavior. He also points out that sometimes the highest Circles do, in fact, use the language of right and wrong when disciplining their own children.

The Circles’ weakest point, according to the Square, is their relations with women. The circular class is responsible for documenting irregularities among all shapes, but since women are straight lines, it is difficult to locate their irregularities. Given this, all women must have a “certified pedigree” in order to marry (39). Circles themselves, despite their own nobility, are attracted to lower-class women and even aim to marry women descended from Irregular ancestors. These marriages usually do not produce children, but when they do, the polygonal children have actually lost sides rather than gained them. However, this does not seem to deter the Circles.

The Square then describes a decree, passed 300 years previously, that declared women too emotional and too lacking in intelligence to be treated like rational beings or to receive even the most basic education. As a result, the male Flatlanders must lead what he calls a “bi-lingual” or “bi-mental” existence in which their language implies that they are deferring to women while they are actually maintaining their power and continuing to treat women as though they are mindless (40). The Square is concerned that because male children receive this kind of double education—in both language and thought—they will be less and less able to discern what is actually true. He is also anxious about what might happen if women should somehow learn to read and think independently. He closes the section with an appeal to Flatland’s authorities to rethink its policy on female education.

Part 1, Sections 7-12 Analysis

The bulk of these sections focus on the ill-fated Colour Revolt, a popular uprising that echoes certain elements of the French Revolution of 1789, and, perhaps more interestingly, the Paris Commune of 1871. While the 1789 revolution was successful, leading to the overthrow and eventual execution of King Louis XVI and a brief but earnest attempt at complete social equality, the Paris Commune last only 71 days. It was instituted when the French National Guard defeated the French Army and took over the city; its progressive government, run by ordinary people, instituted a system of social democracy that abolished child labor, gave women more civil rights, and reduced the influence of religion in politics. With both the Colour Revolt and the Paris Commune, much of the working-class radicalism originated with the soldiers, and both movements were brutally suppressed. In his description of the Colour Revolt, the Square appears to give voice to Abbott’s own feelings about progressive political systems. The previous section, in which the Square discusses “Irregular figures,” was highly satirical in tone, but the sections in which he describes the Revolt are noticeably serious. But regardless of how Abbott himself felt about revolutionary social movements, the novel depicts this one favorably, and the Square is genuinely sad when describing its ultimate defeat.

These sections of the novel also highlight the importance of aesthetic pleasure, in both everyday life and political life. After all, it is Chromatistes’s discovery of color and painting that start the revolt in the first place, which suggests that art has a power over large groups of people that few other practices have. The sudden appearance of color in the world transforms the Square’s feeling about life itself: “To live was then in itself a delight, because living implied seeing” (27). This phrasing not only suggests that art is something vital and necessary, but parallels the phrase l’art pour l’art, or “art for art’s sake,” which was popularized by French writer Théophile Gautier in the mid-19th century. It expresses the belief that the value of authentic art lies not in in its social, political, or didactic functions but in its beauty and capacity to give pleasure and joy. Although the act of painting eventually becomes highly politicized in Flatland, the Square implies here that some Flatlanders might have gained pleasure from color’s mere existence even without expecting it to change their material lives. This turn of phrase also connects art to seeing, reminding the reader how important perception and vision are throughout the novel. Where previously sight was a means of distinguishing between classes and thus propping up the power of the ruling class, here it becomes an instrument of pure delight, available to all.

The incident that ultimately destroys the Colour Revolt is an act of sexual assault that reflects widely held, problematic attitudes about working-class men, men of color, and intellectually or cognitively impaired men. The offender in this case is an Isosceles triangle “of a low type, with a brain little if at all above four degrees” who tricks a polygonal woman—a woman of a higher class status—into having sex with him (32). While the novel largely blames the man for this, and locates his motivation for the rape in his low social status, it also blames the woman, who later dies by suicide, for “an almost inconceivable fatuity and neglect of ordinary precautions” (32). However, Flatland operates in a satirical mode. For all his intelligence and inquisitiveness, the Square still interprets events according to the assumptions of his own social world. In passages like this, the satire rests on the ironic distance between the Square’s understanding and that of the reader. Such satire attempts to force the reader to see how absurd it is to blame the person who was subjected to a sexual assault rather than the perpetrator, or to assume that members of the lower class are inherently more violent than their “superiors,” with the intention that readers will then be better equipped to recognize similar absurdities in their own social environments.

This portion of the novel ends by delving more deeply into religious life in Flatland. In another instance of meta-narration, the Square expresses a desire to talk about other details, like how Flatlanders propel themselves around and how they build structures despite lacking hands, but he acknowledges that describing Flatland’s priests would be more useful for the reader. This reluctant choice suggests that the Square—and possibly Abbott himself—feels some ambivalence about the social and political power wielded by religious institutions and those who control them. The priestly Circles are depicted as the most brutal and repressive group in Flatland, willing to sacrifice their own children if it means potentially gaining social and cultural power more quickly than they otherwise would. The Circles also see women as valuable only if they have certain physical characteristics, which reflects their obsession with “configuration” in determining the worth of any Flatland inhabitant. On the whole, the Square portrays the priests as corrupt, cruel, and motivated solely by the desire to maintain positions of authority even at the expense of vulnerable, marginalized populations.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text