55 pages • 1 hour read
Cynthia VoigtA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide discusses mental illness, domestic violence, food insecurity, and child hunger.
The novel explores the dynamics of sibling relationships in difficult times by building multifaceted characters who cling to each other while grappling with the emotional distress that accompanies homelessness, abandonment, and uncertainty. Through both positive and negative interactions, Dicey, James, Maybeth, and Sammy navigate their complex individual relationships with each of their siblings.
As the novel’s leading protagonist, Dicey is defined by her sense of responsibility to her younger siblings. Dicey sacrifices her own needs and wants for her family’s well-being, leading her to feel weighed down by the burden of caring for young children. This dynamic builds tension and conflict in the family. At one point, Dicey threatens to leave Sammy behind before relenting to carry him on her back:
The afternoon was bleached hot white, hotter and whiter for Dicey with Sammy on her back. The air tasted bad in her mouth, as she gasped for breath. [...] Dicey forced her feet to move, and her legs, and her hands to hold tight on to Sammy’s feet, and her back to stay straight because in the long run that would hurt less (27).
Carrying Sammy down the hot road, Dicey’s responsibility for her siblings becomes physicalized as she bears the burden of her brother’s body. In caring for her younger siblings, Dicey becomes more familiar with Liza’s burdens. She develops empathy for her mother, who exhibited symptoms of mental illness, and understands her desire to give up. Despite this empathy for her mother’s departure, Dicey herself prioritizes keeping her family together, sacrificing her physical and emotional well-being to keep her siblings safe. The fact that Dicey never quits her responsibilities to her siblings adds to her already apparent strength and resilience.
While Dicey emphasizes the importance of the siblings sticking together as a family, their unique perspectives individuate them, revealing that the Tillermans’ dynamic is as much about embracing each sibling’s strengths as it is about cohering into a single sibling unit. They learn to depend on each other, finding comfort in each sibling’s endearing traits like Sammy’s loyalty, Maybeth’s musical talents, or James’s academic gifts. Their individuality complicates their journey to find a safe home, as not all the children have the same goals or flourish in the same environments; for example, James thrives at his Catholic school while staying at Cousin Eunice’s, but Sammy and Maybeth suffer. That James chooses to leave with Dicey and his siblings despite his academic achievements reveals the importance he places on togetherness and mutual success. Ultimately, the siblings seek an environment where each is free to be themselves, underscoring that even under duress, successful sibling relationships rely on balancing individual strengths with familial unity.
Throughout the narrative, the Tillerman children grapple with their understanding and definition of home and family. Their journey challenges traditional notions of belonging and kinship. Ultimately, the children learn to define home and family as a fluid concept depending less on a specific location and more on the bonds of love and connection.
As they travel from place to place, the Tillermans understand that home is not something to be found but rather a concept to be created. Multiple examples illustrate how not to define home and family. For instance, while Eunice’s house offers shelter, clothing, and food, it comes with conditions and a constant threat of removal for not meeting Eunice’s expectations. Eunice and Father Joseph criticize Liza for not marrying the children’s father or for providing the children with religious education, highlighting traditional definitions of home and family. Moreover, although Abigail remained married and raised all her children in the farmhouse, she failed to protect them from her abusive husband, eventually losing all of her relationships with her sons and daughters. Abigail discusses her familial regrets about watching her family fall apart with Dicey, who realizes, “They didn’t have to have a place, they just had to have themselves” (369). Though the Tillerman children lack food, shelter, and clean clothing, they provide a sanctuary for each other where they can feel loved, cherished, and accepted, no matter their physical location.
Additionally, the Tillermans use forgiveness and reconciliation to define home and family. James and Dicey frequently contradict each other, and Sammy often disobeys Dicey’s commands. Without fail, the children speak honestly about their frustrations before apologizing, forgiving, and moving forward with a better understanding of each other. Moreover, self-forgiveness emerges as critical and necessary to family structures. Dicey convinces Abigail to embrace the mistakes of her past by learning from them. She expresses confidence that Abigail won’t repeat past offenses while sheltering her grandchildren. The Tillerman children invite Abigail to be a part of their well-defined family, giving her the name “Gran” as a symbol of their acceptance.
Through various conflicts and confrontations with the societal structures meant to protect them, the Tillerman children encounter the limitations of institutional systems like law enforcement, the foster care system, and religious organizations. One of the central aspects of this theme is the portrayal of women and children as vulnerable individuals often marginalized within patriarchal systems.
Dicey’s experience highlights specific vulnerabilities unique to women and girls that are often exploited by authority figures and institutional systems. Early in the narrative, Dicey hides her identity as a girl, telling James, “It’s safer to be a boy than a girl […] People leave boys alone more” (57). When Dicey eventually puts her trust in authority figures like Eunice and Father Joseph, they ignore her advocacy to keep the Tillerman children together while discrediting her assessment of Maybeth’s academic skills. Simultaneously, they expect her to shoulder all domestic responsibilities and childcare duties while James is entitled to pursue his education. Dicey’s experiences highlight the unequal expectations placed on women to sacrifice all personal ambition while shouldering the burden of raising and caring for the next generation. This divide is further reinforced by Eunice’s choice to forfeit her goal of becoming a nun to care for the Tillerman children; unlike nuns, Catholic priests are free to adopt children should they desire to do so, whereas Eunice is forced to choose one path over the other.
In several instances, authority figures perpetuate stigma and shame about social services. The disapproval of financial welfare programs impacts families needing help, so much so that they refuse to accept assistance out of pride. Throughout the novel, this stigma is primarily felt by women struggling to support their children, like Abigail and Liza, which only adds to the burden many already face in shouldering childcare and housework responsibilities. While explaining why she cannot afford to shelter and protect the Tillerman children, Abigail asserts, “I never took charity” (366). Dicey replies, “Momma wouldn’t, either. That’s why she was taking us to Aunt Cilla’s house” (366). However, after a store clerk reminds Abigail that she is entitled to make use of the government benefits that her taxes help fund, Abigail ultimately decides to accept government support in order to raise her grandchildren. The shift in Abigail's perspective highlights a critical turning point in the novel, illustrating how overcoming societal stigma allows families to seek and receive the help they need for survival and stability.
The Tillerman children face homelessness, food insecurity, threats of violence, and threats of separation, among other challenges. By learning to depend on each other and drawing from their inner strengths, the children unlock new potential to provide and protect each other while taking command of their situation.
Dicey emerges as an early leader in the children’s journey, framing their vulnerable circumstances as a positive opportunity for newfound strength. After an arduous first leg of their journey ending in a sprint to shelter through the rain, Dicey declares, “I feel as if we could do just about anything. Because we’re the Tillermans” (43). This inspirational statement reinforces Dicey as the leader of the Tillerman clan. James, Sammy, and Maybeth have yet to develop confidence and resilience, but Dicey empowers her siblings to believe they will survive their journey while remaining united. While the younger children feel scared, unsure, and vulnerable, Dicey sees their situation as an opportunity for growth, self-discovery, and strength.
Later, Dicey reflects on the Tillermans’ journey, recognizing the tests and trials the family faced as proof of her grit and resilience. Abigail asserts, “You’ve got determination,” to which Dicey replies, “Momma said it was in my blood […] I never knew what she meant before” (368-69). Not only do Dicey and her siblings survive harsh natural environments, but they also exhibit defiance by confronting injustices and inequalities that permeate their lives. Moreover, the children transform their insecurity about an unsure future into a hopeful experience in which they will decide their fate. When Abigail tells the children they’re not welcome to live with her permanently, Dicey considers returning to Will and Claire in the circus over returning to Eunice’s house, where the siblings will likely be separated. United with an unbreakable family bond, Dicey shows unwavering control over her family’s ultimate circumstance, demonstrating the strength she has developed through navigating vulnerability.
By Cynthia Voigt