65 pages • 2 hours read
Rachel SchneiderA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In the dramatic climax to Metal Slinger, Jovie reveals that she has spent nearly the whole novel planning to betray Acker in order to get close enough to the Kenta court to overthrow Acker’s despotic father, King Edmond. She covers up this trickery by letting Acker believe that she is hurt by Kai’s supposed coercion and betrayal. However, she and Kai have feigned this conflict specifically to manipulate Acker’s negative impression of Kai. This duplicity establishes a paradigm in which Jovie spends the novel pretending that she cannot forgive the very betrayal that she intends to perpetuate: the manipulation of someone she loves by controlling their perception of that love.
Although Jovie’s narration for much of the novel portrays Kai’s betrayal of her love as genuine, the climactic scenes reveal the true nature of this deception. In this light, Jovie’s frequent musings on the nature of her love for Kai take on a new meaning. Because Kai never actually betrayed Jovie, her reevaluation of her feelings for him indicates that her new connection to Acker is the deciding factor in this internal shift. In short, only because her connection to Acker has allowed her to understand the true nature of romantic love can she finally judge her affection for Kai to be purely platonic. By deciding that her affection for Kai is based on friendship, not romance, she implicitly indicates that her deeper feelings for Acker are authentic despite her commitment to her plan to betray him. The novel therefore suggests that love and betrayal are not mutually exclusive concepts.
Given Jovie’s status as the protagonist and her conflicted feelings about betraying Acker, the novel supports Jovie’s conviction that it is possible to betray a loved one without compromising that love—even if the relationship itself is irreparably damaged. The novel frames Jovie’s choice to betray someone she loves as a form of moral behavior, given her reasons for doing so. Ultimately, rather than choosing betrayal over love, Jovie chooses the love she holds for her people over her love for Acker.
When Jovie and Acker first arrive in Kenta, Jovie watches the man she is beginning to love take his place on a throne beside his father, King Edmond—the very man whom she has long known to be a corrupt and malevolent ruler. As she witnesses Acker’s “predilection for power” firsthand (364), the scene makes her anxious about her relationship with him, and this unease colors her perception of Acker for the remainder of the novel. The narrative also implies that this spectacle convinces her not to entrust him with her scheme despite her love for him. Notably, Schneider suggests that Jovie’s caution is justified, and the narrative repeatedly links a thirst for power to a broader potential for corruption that leads rulers to exploit others for their own gain.
Wren and Edmond are the two clear examples of the corruptive influence of power. Both leaders have ruled their respective territories for centuries, as their magical powers have granted them extreme longevity. Although this longevity is implied to be connected to their corruption, it is not framed as equally central to their cruelty; instead, both men are led by their desire to protect and extend their own power. This inherent selfishness is shown to be the preeminent cause of corruption among leaders in Schneider’s world. The novel therefore argues that when a leader seizes power out of a desire to gain a following, that leadership will inevitably be tainted by corruption.
By contrast, the novel suggests that searching for power in order to help those with less power is, at heart, a moral goal. To this end, Jovie, Messer, Beau, and Kai all risk their lives and happiness in order to fight against the tyrannical rulers whose violence they have been forced to endure. The novel suggests that any power that these characters access comes at a great personal cost, and this sacrifice therefore outweighs the personal benefits that they might gain from that power. Ultimately, these characters seek leadership not to benefit themselves but to benefit their people—and their search therefore serves as a moral counterpart to Wren and Edmond’s self-aggrandizing efforts. This dichotomy notably leaves Acker in an unclear position, as he often acts selfishly by prioritizing his love affair with Jovie over greater concerns. While Jovie returns his love, Acker’s decisions make it unclear whether he would ever be willing to sacrifice his own happiness for the greater good, as Josie clearly is. Thus, while Jovie remains convinced that Acker has a “good heart” and would make an acceptable ruler of Kenta, she does not trust him enough to include him in her plans to overthrow his corrupt father.
Spending most of her childhood in isolated, water-bound Alaha leaves Jovie eager to see land, even for the brief period that she is allowed to tour the Market in Kenta. This desire is echoed by all the other people of Alaha, as they have been condemned to live forever at sea after Wren lost a war with Kenta many, many years ago. The punishment is shown to be an effective one, as Wren’s lack of contact with the land limits his magical power and also disempowers his people, resulting in consequences that are at once material, emotional, and magical.
The material pressures of lacking a land-based home are the most pressing concerns faced by the people of Alaha. Without land, they are constrained to life on a small grove of trees that grow directly from the saltwater, and these circumstances limit their growth as a community by rendering the population vulnerable to storms and lack of food. Because Alaha is forced to rely on access to Kenta for food, Edmond uses this advantage to deliberately harm the Alaha people. In this light, the control of land becomes the single most powerful political bargaining chip that a ruler can possess, as well as the defining difference between antagonists Wren and Edmond. While they both seek to control people for their own gain, Edmond does so from the seat of a powerful, land-based kingdom, while Wren is limited to a struggling ocean-based community whose people are floundering in their struggle to survive.
The emotional and magical consequences of being without a homeland are deeply complex for Jovie, and she keenly feels this issue when she physically touches land on Roison and awakens her magical powers. The process of gaining her magic is a painful, life-threatening experience that nonetheless makes her feel more like her true self it. Similarly, the feeling of being present in a land that she cannot call her own ultimately heightens her awareness of her own keen longing for a homeland. However, the novel does not clarify whether Jovie’s idea of a homeland is Maile, Alaha, or some other land that operates according to her values.
Action & Adventure
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection