logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Ijeoma Oluo

So You Want to Talk About Race

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Introduction-Chapter 4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Introduction Summary: “So you want to talk about race”

The Introduction sketches out the myriad ways in which race has inflected Oluo’s life experiences. She discusses the negative aspects of being Black in the United States, such as being followed in stores, the wage gap, and microaggressions in the workplace—notably, being told she was “too ‘loud’” and that her hair was “too ‘ethnic.’” Conversely, she presents race as a positive facet of her identity. Jazz, rap, and R&B music, the creative output of Black artists, and the accomplishments of Black activists are sources of pride and inspiration.

Oluo recalls working harder than her White colleagues, being overly polite, and laughing off racist jokes. As she grew older and more successful, however, brushing off racism became increasingly difficult. She began pushing back against the status quo and demanding more of those around her by transforming her popular food blog into a forum to discuss race. Her following grew alongside the widespread dissemination of videos of police brutality against people of color. These increasingly common videos fueled discussions about racism within the Black community and alerted White people to racial injustice, often for the first time. The Introduction ends with a clear statement of intent: Oluo aims to facilitate painful and uncomfortable conversations about race, racism, and racial oppression in American society. 

Chapter 1 Summary: “Is it really about race?”

Chapter 1 draws attention to the ways in which the issue of race is often displaced by the issue of class. In the minds of many, improving the plight of the poor will automatically improve the plight of racial minorities. Oluo challenges this idea, arguing that Black people are poor for different reasons than White people. For instance, a person with a “black sounding” name is less likely to land a job interview and would thus not benefit from government-mandated increases in minimum wage and stronger unions. In short, many of the solutions aimed at alleviating poverty will not help people of color.

Race is a social construct that cannot be ignored, despite having no basis in science. It was created both to justify an economic system based on racial exploitation and to lock Black people at the bottom. Racism is exclusionary. It bars people of color from opportunities and progress in order to benefit people deemed superior. If people of color get less, more will end up in the hands of others. Oluo argues that class inequities need to be addressed, but that dismantling the class system will not rid the country of racism. Moreover, just because something is about race does not mean it is not also about class (or sexuality and gender). In other words, the issues are not mutually exclusive. Oluo outlines three rules to determine whether an issue is racially inflected: First, an issue is about race if a person of color believes it to be. Second, an issue is about race if it disproportionately or differently impacts Black people. Third, an issue is about race if it adheres to patterns that disproportionately or differently impact Black people. The chapter ends with a statement validating the experiences of people of color: “If you think it’s about race, you are right” (23).

Chapter 2 Summary: “What is racism?”

Chapter 2 sets out to define racism. Oluo argues that the term should not be reserved for egregious examples, such as Nazism, cross burning, and lynchings. Rather, it should also include the microaggressions people of color face on a daily basis. Resistance to labeling everyday racist behavior as something other than racism is widespread and harmful to people of color. The failure to agree on what constitutes racism hinders meaningful discussions about race. There are two common definitions of racism: “Racism is any prejudice against someone because of their race,” and “Racism is any prejudice against someone because of their race, when those views are reinforced by systems of power” (26). Oluo favors the second definition, which describes systemic racism—that is, racism that is interwoven into the fabric of American society. Examples of systemic racism include White people bemoaning Black-on-Black crime (which leads to police labeling of Black communities as “problem” neighborhoods), and White people complaining about thugs (which is echoed in political discussions of “super-predators”). The racist system, combined with our complacency with it, are far more damaging to people of color than fringe neo-Nazis.

As Oluo observes, how we define racism dictates how we combat it. Changing a racist person’s mind accomplishes less than overturning systemic discrimination, which includes police brutality, racial income imbalances, and the prison industrial complex. The onus for combatting systemic racism should not be on the people being discriminated against. Rather, we must focus on how White people’s actions interact with various systems to oppress people of color. Calling out a teacher for using a racial slur when addressing a Hispanic child is one thing. Recognizing that this behavior will impact how others view and treat that child is another. Viewing racism as a system makes it a larger problem but also offers more opportunities for solutions.

Chapter 3 Summary: “What if I talk about race wrong?”

Chapter 3 describes an uncomfortable conversation about race between Oluo and her mother, a White woman who claimed to understand what it was like to be Black by virtue of having raised two Black children. The ensuing discussion about living with Black people, as opposed to being Black, prompted a change in Oluo’s mother: She shifted her focus away from proving that she understood Black people to “pressuring fellow white people to do better” (38). The anecdote not only encourages White people to become advocates for people of color, but also highlights how fraught conversations about race can be, even with family members. Indeed, it is the fear of damaging relationships that leads many to avoid the topic of race entirely.

As Oluo notes, however, race exists, whether or not we choose to ignore it. She stresses that most people will not get the discussion right the first time and that conversations will invariably be uncomfortable. She then provides tips to minimize the damage and maximize the benefits of dialogue. Stating your intentions, remembering your top priority in the conversation, and doing research are critical first steps. Not making an anti-racism argument oppressive against other groups is also critical to having a productive exchange. Feeling defensive is natural. Oluo recommends pausing to question the root of those feelings. She also suggests not policing people’s tone to increase one’s comfort, as well as keeping the conversation on track. (White people should avoid making the conversation entirely about their feelings and viewpoint). Questioning one’s motives is also key to having a constructive conversation about race, as is having willing participants. If a conversation goes wrong, it is important to apologize and try again. Racial oppression is an emotional, anger-inducing topic. Simply ignoring it deprives people of color of allies, forcing them to “continue to bear the entire burden of racism alone” (51).

Chapter 4 Summary: “Why am I always being told to ‘check my privilege’?”

In the context of social justice, privilege refers to an advantage or set of advantages some people have that others do not. Having a college degree, growing up wealthy, being heterosexual, being male, and not having a disability are all examples of privilege. Privilege is not restricted to White people. Oluo opens Chapter 4 with an anecdote describing a picnic organized by people of color in Seattle. The decidedly artsy group fell silent when Black men in sports attire asked if they could join them. Oluo describes her discomfort at the exclusionary nature of her group, which unconsciously excluded those most negatively impacted by racism. The group encompassed “comfortable people of color” rather than being a “radical space of acceptance” (58). Her disillusionment prompted her to be more inclusive in her discussions of racial injustice. 

“Check your privilege” is a much-maligned phrase that is often dismissed and derided. However, it is a necessary phrase, as it reminds people to consider their advantages and how they contribute to their worldview. Conversely, it prompts people to consider how their lack of disadvantages prevents them from understanding the struggles of others. Checking one’s privilege is difficult, but not nearly as difficult as living with the consequences of the unexamined privilege of others. Examining privilege helps identify the ways we personally perpetuate oppression while simultaneously creating opportunities for meaningful change. Feeling guilty about one’s privilege is a small price to pay if it leads to a more inclusive approach to social justice. 

Introduction-Chapter 4 Analysis

The overarching aim of Oluo’s book is to facilitate discussions about race and racial oppression in America. The material is both conceptually challenging and highly charged. Oluo overcomes these hurdles by starting each chapter with a personal anecdote. Her emphasis on lived experience clarifies complex issues through the use of concrete examples. In Chapter 1, for example, Oluo describes a conversation she had with a White friend who attempted to sidestep the issue of race by focusing on the related but separate issue of class. He reasoned that improving the plight of the poor though increases in minimum wage and stronger unions would automatically improve the plight of minorities.

The anecdote both sheds light on the limits standard poverty solutions have for people of color and illustrates the push-back advocates of racial parity face, even when conversing with friends. Chapter 2 similarly opens with a personal encounter, this time between Oluo and a coworker who expressed racist opinions about welfare recipients online. The episode illustrates the pervasiveness of racism in the United States. Even more telling is the reaction of one of Oluo’s White friends, who refused to call the incident racist. For this friend, the term racism should be used judiciously and only to describe extreme examples of racist behavior.

The opening anecdote of Chapter 3 demonstrates that even parents of Black children can be racially insensitive in some circumstances. During a fraught phone conversation, Oluo’s mother, who is White, relayed an encounter she had with a Black colleague who called her out for telling a joke with a Black punchline. (She specifies that the joke was not at the expense of people of color, but for them). The ensuing discussion lays bare an essential fact: White people, no matter how well-meaning and empathetic, can never fully understand what it is like to be a Black person “who experiences the full force of a White supremacist society firsthand” (43).

This is true even for those who live with and love Black people. The anecdote in Chapter 4, which describes a social event for Black artists, professors, musicians, and tech leaders, demonstrates that some people of color also have privilege (in this case, education and professional success), which can lead to exclusionary behavior. In an interview with Evette Dionne for Bitch Media (18 January 2018), Oluo explained that her use of personal stories in her writing stems from her desire to reach people and to foster understanding across racial divides (Dionne, Evette. “Ijeoma Oluo is still speaking truth to power.” Bitch Media, 18 Jan 2018, https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/bitch-interview/ijeoma-oluo).  

Oluo’s opening chapters introduce readers to a critical concept that anchors the rest of the book: systemic racism. Most people would agree that racism constitutes discrimination based on a person’s skin color, but relatively few understand the various systems of power that reinforce racism. As Oluo argues in Chapter 2, failing to take systems of power into account reduces racism to individuals and their racist thoughts and actions. Oluo’s goal is not to win over or even call out individual racists, many of whom have little real power and operate on the fringes of society. Rather, she takes aim at the racism built into America’s institutions, including its schools, police forces, and political apparatus. Her definition of racism implicates every White person living in the US:

What is important is that the impotent hatred of the virulent racist was built and nurtured by a system that has much more insidiously woven a quieter, yet no less violent, version of those same oppressive beliefs into the fabric of our society. The truth is, you don’t even have to ‘be racist’ to be a part of the racist system […] Systemic racism is a machine that runs whether we pull the levers or not, and by just letting it be, we are responsible for what it produces. We have to actually dismantle the machine if we want to make change (28-30).

While Chapter 2 defines and describes systemic racism, Chapter 4 offers concrete examples of how it operates by tackling the issue of privilege. Advantages are often ascribed to particular social groups based on race, physical ability, gender, and class. Other kinds of privilege relate to sexuality, body type, and neurological ability. Addressing systemic racial discrimination requires understanding the full impact of White privilege and the varied ways in which the deck is stacked against people of color. As Oluo observes, privilege based on race and other criteria is a threatening topic because it challenges ideas of fairness that are deeply engrained in American culture: “The concept of privilege violates […] everything we’ve been told about the American Dream of hard work paying off and good things happening to good people” (63).

Painful as it is, addressing privilege is a prerequisite to dismantling discrimination of all kinds. The key lies in individuals identifying where their privilege converges with someone else’s oppression. These points of convergence provide opportunities for change. An able-bodied person, for instance, might question why there are no disabled people in their workplace. Similarly, a White person might ask their elected officials how they plan to address issues disproportionately affecting people of color, such as food deserts and racial income inequality. A person who reaped the benefits of an expensive private school education might lobby for more funding for public schools, while someone with a flexible work schedule might support efforts for employer-funded childcare. There are myriad ways to leverage privilege to engender measurable change, but the first step is recognizing that privilege exists.

Oluo’s opening chapters underscore the emotional toll of writing about and discussing race, even with family and friends. This aspect of being Black in America is often superseded by other, more imperative facets of racial discrimination, such as income disparity, police brutality, and the mass incarceration of Black men. However, Oluo’s Introduction and first four chapters reveal that confronting and discussing racial oppression on a daily basis wears on people of color, even those whose job it is to engage with the topic. In her Introduction, for example, Oluo reveals that having conversations about race is never easy. She also calls the process of writing her book “grueling” and “heart-wrenching.” In Chapter 2, she recalls a heated and ultimately fruitless discussion with a co-worker about mandatory drug tests for welfare recipients that she describes as “emotionally draining.” The following day, Oluo was left “angry” and “heartbroken” after relating the exchange to a close friend, who refused to label the incident racist.

In Chapter 3, Oluo describes how she has “cringed’ her way through countless conversations about race, and how discussing the topic continues to impact her. During a call with her mother, for example, Oluo held the phone six inches away from her ear to make the conversation less painful. (She also wished that the earth would open up and swallow her). Despite the emotional toll, Oluo continues to talk and write about race. She spells out her reasoning in Chapter 3: “I’d love to not have to talk about race ever again. I do not enjoy it. It is not fun […] But I have to talk about race, because it is made an issue in the ways in which race is addressed or, more accurately, not addressed” (45).

Racial oppression is an emotional topic for White people as well. As Oluo observes, White people take an emotional risk every time they investigate their role in upholding systemic racism. Conversations can quickly become uncomfortable, leading to feelings of frustration, defensiveness, and guilt (in addition to doing real damage to people of color). An important strategy for White people is to shift the emphasis away from personal feelings: “If you find yourself frequently referring to your feelings and viewpoint, chances are, you are making this all about you” (53). Understanding racism should always be the top priority. This goal should not be superseded by emotions, nor should it be set aside simply because it is difficult. Talking about racial oppression raises unpleasant emotions, but these emotions should not be misplaced. As Oluo notes, the topic should always induce anger: “As long as racism exists to ruin the lives of countless people of color, it should be something that upsets us. But it upsets us because it exists, not because we talk about it” (51).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text