logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Bertolt Brecht

The Threepenny Opera

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1928

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Corruption as a Universal Constant

Content warning: This section of the guide discusses sexual content.

Bertolt Brecht’s The Threepenny Opera portrays a corrupt society, in which morality is a facade and power is dictated by exploitation. This post-Christian world is ruled by a capitalist elite, which has implemented corruption as an intrinsic and inescapable part of life. Through the play’s characters and their cynical justifications, Brecht argues that corruption is systemic, meaning that it is woven into the very fabric of law, justice, and survival. The text presents a grim reality: Those in power exploit the weak, and those who wish to survive must play by the same unscrupulous rules.

One of the clearest manifestations of systemic corruption is the relationship between Peachum, Macheath, and Tiger Brown, which reveals how law enforcement and crime are two sides of the same coin. In an exchange in Act III, Peachum confronts Brown about Macheath’s ability to roam freely despite his criminal status, saying that Macheath does so “Because he’s your pal, Brown” (94). Here, Brecht shows the blurred lines between law and crime, revealing how those in power selectively enforce justice based on personal alliances rather than moral principles. Brown’s admission that he must suppress the beggars’ protest in order to preserve his position further exemplifies this theme. He states, in a revengeful streak, “Tonight, Peachum, I’ve hit on the solution, and I believe I may say, saved a friend from mortal peril. I’ll simply smoke out your whole nest” (95). In the confrontation between Brown and Peachum, the beggars, the most vulnerable ones, are weaponized and ultimately harmed. Ultimately, Brecht’s message is that the law does not serve the people; rather, it serves itself and those who manipulate it to their advantage.

Beyond the corruption of individual characters, The Threepenny Opera suggests that the entire structure of society is built on exploitation. This idea is most emphatically expressed in the “Second Threepenny Finale: What Keeps Mankind Alive?” The song attacks the hypocrisy of the ruling class, who preach morality while ignoring the fundamental needs of the people: 

You gentlemen who think you have a mission 
To purge us of the seven deadly sins 
Should first sort out the basic food position 
Then start your preaching: that’s where it begins (88). 

Brecht argues that corruption is a necessity for survival. Those in power construct a moral framework that justifies their own dominance while keeping the lower classes subdued.

Therefore, The Threepenny Opera portrays corruption as an unavoidable constant in human society (or at least capitalist society). The characters do not challenge the system; they navigate it, using whatever means necessary to secure their own survival. Peachum manipulates beggars, Brown abuses his authority, and Macheath profits from crime—all while maintaining the veneer of respectability. The play suggests that in a world driven by economic disparity and self-interest, morality is a luxury few can afford. As the finale chillingly concludes, “For once you must try not to shirk the facts: / Mankind is kept alive by bestial acts” (89).

The Fragile Nature of Power

In challenging the idea that holding a position of power implies any sort of moral authority, The Threepenny Opera also reveals the vulnerability of those in power. Through the interactions between Macheath and Brown, as well as Macheath’s plea for forgiveness, Brecht explores the fact that power is dictated by shifting allegiances rather than absolute authority and suggests that many fall from power when they must face the ultimate consequences of their compromised choices.

The relationship between Macheath and Brown exemplifies the precarious balance between power and vulnerability. Despite their supposed opposition—one a criminal, the other a police chief—their friendship demonstrates how a relationship of mutual benefit advances the power of both men. Macheath reflects on their long-standing relationship, stating, “Though life with its raging torrent has carried us boyhood friends far apart, although our professional interests are very different, some people would go so far as to say diametrically opposed, our friendship has come through unimpaired” (51). This statement reveals that power structures often function on personal loyalty: Macheath’s ability to evade capture for so long stems not from his cunning alone but from the support he receives from Brown, who warns him of impending raids. This give-and-take dynamic highlights how power is sustained through networks of corruption, making those involved both powerful and vulnerable—dependent on one another’s discretion to maintain their positions. Sure enough, Macheath and Brown’s friendship is one of the ideals sacrificed on the altar of self-interest, as Brown betrays Macheath for fear that his position might be in jeopardy.

The play also illustrates how quickly power can be stripped away, leaving individuals vulnerable to the same structures they once manipulated. Macheath’s downfall is accompanied by a desperate plea for understanding in the “Ballad in Which Macheath Begs All Men for Forgiveness.” In this moment, the once-powerful bandit faces the consequences of his fall from power, acknowledging the inevitability of his fate: “O brothers, learn from us how it begins / And pray to God that He forgive our sins” (113). This shift from power to vulnerability is a central theme in the play—those who once controlled their own destiny through corruption and alliances ultimately find themselves at the mercy of the same forces. Macheath acknowledges the cycle of ambition and downfall, recognizing that his pursuit of power was driven by the same forces that now condemn him.

Overall, the text shows how control is maintained through corrupt relationships and how quickly the powerful can become the powerless—a depiction that reflects the unstable sociohistorical context of the Weimar Republic. However, beyond this context, the play suggests that power structures are inherently unstable, as they are built upon shifting allegiances and the perpetual exploitation of the vulnerable.

The Futility of Human Aspirations

Through its cynical worldview, the play argues that intelligence, ambition, and love are not means to success but liabilities in a system that rewards ruthlessness. “The Solomon Song,” sung by Jenny, the sex worker who betrays her ex-lover, exemplifies this theme, as the historical examples used in the song serve as a reminder that greatness does not automatically lead to triumph. The song provides a parallel to the downfall of Macheath, who fails not because of his crimes but because of his human weaknesses, especially his womanizing habits.

Jenny’s performance of “The Solomon Song” encapsulates the disillusionment at the heart of The Threepenny Opera. She recounts the fates of iconic historical figures—Solomon, Cleopatra, and Caesar—who, despite their wisdom, beauty, or strength, met untimely ends. The song’s refrain expresses the play’s rejection of conventional morality:

How great and wise was Solomon! 
But now that time is getting late 
The world can see what followed on. 
It’s wisdom that had brought him to this state— 
How fortunate the man with none! (109). 

Rather than celebrating these figures’ intelligence or might, the song suggests that their virtues were the very cause of their downfall. Brecht uses irony to expose a world in which talent and aspiration are not rewarded but instead become burdens that lead to destruction.

Macheath’s arc further reinforces this idea, showing that aspirations—even those of a criminal—are ultimately doomed. Jenny cynically reflects that his downfall was not due to his robberies or murders, but because of his emotions:

If only he’d known where to stop
And stuck to crimes he knew all about
He surely would have reached the top.
But one fine day his heart was won.
So now that time is getting late
The world can see what followed on.
His sexual urges brought him to this state—
How fortunate the man with none! (110).

In Brecht’s world, success belongs not to those with ambition or love, but to those who abandon sentimentality altogether. Macheath’s sexual entanglements weaken him, making him vulnerable to betrayal and rendering his aspirations to power and status meaningless.

This sense of futility extends beyond individual figures to encompass society as a whole. The play’s depiction of beggars, sex workers, and criminals illustrates that regardless of one’s aspirations—whether for wealth, security, or love—society remains rigged in favor of those who exploit others. Indeed, idealism is itself often a tool of oppression; Peachum’s success lies in his ability to exploit the aspirations of others, as he cynically observes that morality is only for those who can afford it. The play’s final message is that, in a world driven by greed and oppression, it is not the wise, the strong, or the loving who survive, but the ruthless.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text